<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Automation Bias on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/automation-bias/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Automation Bias on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/automation-bias/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Meat Proxy</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/applied-ai/05-chapter/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:05 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/applied-ai/05-chapter/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part 1 — Where You Stand&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;ten-weeks&#34;&gt;Ten weeks&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Week one, the model drafts a paragraph review and you read every line of it. You disagree with two of its four flags, check a source yourself, rewrite one sentence. The whole thing takes twenty minutes and you feel you have earned the output.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Week three, the reviews have been good. You read them properly but you stop re-checking the sources it says it checked. Nothing bad happens.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
